George Washington Essay Example for Free

George upper-case letter EssayIt has often been said that the entire ordeal leading up the American Revolution occurred as a direct result of devil stances not having a common actualiseing. In fact, this simple adaptation of the more complicated problem might not completely explain everything that happened leading up to and during the new War, but it can be used as an explanation for the rift in thinking that eventu exclusivelyy kept the two sides apart on a theoretical level. The British, for the most part, mistacit what the colonists were looking for in their striving for freedom. The colonists, on the another(prenominal) hand, held a fighting spirit that could not easily be understood by quite a little who were not there to experience it on a day-to-day basis. Two turgid thinkers from either side, George capital letter and Edmund murder, laid out their opinions on the matter in easy to understand terms. Their books represent an interesting dichotomy. polish off, for the most part, understood what was going on in the colonies. Washington took an approach of big support for his coarsemen, which was representative of the patriotic spirit that permeated the time.Though Washington could never be accused of cosmos a person that managed to get his hands too muddy in the political arena, he did have a pretty firm grasp on the overall feeling of the American people at that time. When he writes to George William Fairfax and Bryan Fairfax in a series of 1774 letters, Washington makes it very clear that he believes the country is ready to stand as one in the face of British opposition. Washington was a measured man and one that was certainly not fast(a) to jump to any conclusions without first investigating the other options.In his letter to Bryan Fairfax, Washington gives a clear indication of this and further makes indication that he believes all of his options to be expended. When he writes, Shall we, after this, whine and cry for relief, when we have already tried it in vain, Washington clearly indicates that perhaps, making requests of the British establishment is not enough anymore. To George Washington, capital of Massachusetts was only the breaking focalize in a counterpoint that had been long overdue.The plight of Boston was the plight of American and the conflict had arrived because, just put, they had no other choice but to put up a fight. Though Washington was quick to lend his support to the folks in Boston, he was not fully supportive of their means. Though he agreed that perhaps what they did was demand, he did not completely approve of how they went about things. As mentioned onward, Washington was a calculated individual in every way. He hoped for people to take all options into account before making rash decisions.When the people of Boston opted to toss pounds and pounds of tea into the harbor, they were not making the most creditworthy decision, but they were making a statement. Washington could re spect that statement and the stand that they had the guts to take, even if he did not undyingly support their actions. Washington wrote, The conduct of the Boston people could not justify the rigor of their measures. Still, he goes on to qualify that statement later in his letter. He indicates that sometimes, measures such as those are necessary when people will not take others seriously or respect their requests.To Washington, the main point was that a stand had to be taken somewhere, so he wasnt angry that the people of Boston do that statement. In fact, he was happy with the idea of having a rallying point around which the colonists could congregate. From the British side of things, Edmund Burke took a slightly more contradictory approach with his thinking. He was a well consider British political mind. During that time, most well respected British minds cute to use force and not concede anything to the colonists.Those people did not understand what be actived the colonists and certainly did not understand the passion with which colonists wanted to rid themselves of foul treatment. In short, most British political people, who were all of the way across the Atlantic Ocean, had no idea how bad they American colonists wanted it. Burke got it, however. He knew exactly what the colonists wanted and he understood how to motivate them. Edmund Burkes primary assertion was that the British political sympathies was going about things all wrong.Like Washington, Burke was a very influential and deep thinker. He did not like to act without first thinking through all of the different scenarios that might take place. With that in mind, Burke wanted the British government to work with the American colonists, as opposed to working against them as they had been frame on doing. He thought it was a good idea to promote reconciliation between the two sides because, in his mind, that was the only way to shut down the fighting spirit of the American colonists.When the Brit ish government pushed the Americans into a corner, they banded together and they came out fighting. This is evidenced by Washingtons comments about the Boston Tea Party. Burke similarly wanted to push for reconciliation because he understood the fact that undischarged Britain had to have some sort of working relationship with the colonies in the future. They could not make everyone in the colonies mad. In his barbarism to Parliament on March 22, 1775, Edmund Burke says, Because after all our struggle, whether we will or not, we must(prenominal) govern America. That was Burkes primary point throughout the entirety of this speech. Win, lose, or draw, the British government had to respect the relationship with the colonies on good footing, or else there would eventually be a conflict to face. In addition to plenty of other things, Burke understood the nature of the American people. He also understood that the British government did not understand the nature of the American colonis ts. He knew that Great Britain had to keep that in mind if they wanted to be successful in making the American colonies listen to their rules.A fighting spirit was engrained in the American people and that was something that would not go away. In that same speech to the British Parliament, Burke let his partners in the room know that the American colonists were a fighting bunch. In this character of the Americans, a love of Freedom is the predominating feature which marks and distinguishes the whole. If the British government could not understand that, then according to Burke, they had no chance of exacting any change among the colonists themselves.This basic rift in understanding is the one factor that, according to Edmund Burke, would keep the British government from creating any change. Washing and Burke were on different sides, but they were very similar men. They both understood people and they understood what it took to motivate people. While Washington was a unifying give t ongue to in America, Burke served as a voice of reason in Great Britain. Their specific messages were different, but they were equally important to their respective nations.